<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Birmingham Post - News Blog</title>
        <link>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/</link>
        <description></description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:10:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>&quot;Leave Julie Alone!&quot; Says Lembit</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Julie Kirkbride has received backing from an unlikely source for her hopes of standing again as the Conservative candidate in Bromsgrove.</p>

<p>The Tory MP has made it pretty clear she wants to stay on in Parliament, despite announcing she was standing down.</p>

<p>And now she's been endorsed by high-profile Liberal Democrat MP Lembit Öpik - who urged his own colleagues not to give her a hard time over her expenses claims.</p>

<p>Speaking to ITV Central, Lembit said: "I'm glad she's thinking about this. I know she's felt really shocked by the way she was treated in the media.</p>

<p>"She will have gone through this and decided, is there really something here so serious that I shouldn't stand again?</p>

<p>"I really hope that the Liberal Democrats in Bromsgrove will respect her wishes and not seek to make political gain out of this."</p>

<p>Of course, Lembit knows what it's like to be the centre of media attention, after dating first weather forecaster Sian Lloyd and then half of the Cheeky Girls (in a toe-curling Commons performance he told MPs: "I should point out that the other sister is still single").</p>

<p>Perhaps he sympathises. Or perhaps he's just taken a leaf from Chris Crocker's defence of Britney Spears.</p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/kHmvkRoEowc&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/kHmvkRoEowc&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/11/leave-julie-alone-says-lembit.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/11/leave-julie-alone-says-lembit.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Politics</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Britney Spears</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Julie Kirkbride</category>
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:10:08 +0000</pubDate>

            <longitude></longitude>
            <latitude></latitude>
            <comments>0</comments>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Just because BIA runway extension is in a plan doesn&apos;t mean it will happen</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>My exclusive story a week ago revealing that Birmingham International Airport's £120 million runway extension plan is in deep trouble represents something of an inconvenient truth for West Midlands' political elite.<br />
It is always embarrassing for politicians when people begin to realise that local government's grand plans and strategies are nothing more than meaningless words if the money and the will to deliver major infrastructure projects like the BIA runway simply does not exist.<br />
And let's be absolutely clear about this. Birmingham Airport does not, at the moment, have the money to build a longer runway and even if it did have the funding in place the BIA board remains to be convinced of the business case for doing so.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/11/just-because-bia-runway-extens.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/11/just-because-bia-runway-extens.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Birmingham international airport</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Mike Whitby</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Paul Kehoe</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Stephen Hughes</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:49:30 +0000</pubDate>

            <longitude></longitude>
            <latitude></latitude>
            <comments>2</comments>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Quick Guide to the Queen&apos;s Speech</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>The Queen's Speech set out the laws Labour plans to introduce before the next election. Here are some of the highlights:</p>

<p><strong>Parents and school pupils will be told exactly what they have a right to expect from schools - and gain the right to take schools to court if they are failing to deliver.</strong></p>

<p>The Children, Schools and Families Bill will allow them to complain to the head, then to the local authority, then to the Local Government Ombudsman and finally, if they are still not satisfied, to take a school to court in the form of a judicial review. The Association of School and College Leaders complained today that the Bill will become a "whingers' charter", encouraging litigious parents to complain.</p>

<p><strong>A Financial Services Bill will hand new powers to the Financial Services Authority (FSA) designed to curb unreasonable bonuses, allowing it to void banker contracts and banks those that continue to offer unjustifiable sums.</strong></p>

<p><strong>The Government is once again promising to make parents of anti-social teenagers take responsibility for their child's behaviour. A new Crime and Security Bill will will encourage courts to impose parenting orders, which force parents to attend counselling or guidance sessions, when a child receives an ASBO.</strong></p>

<p><strong>Police will gain the power to evict people accused of domestic violence from their homes temporarily, even if they are not charged with any offence, "empowering victims to feel safe in their homes" according to the Government.</strong></p>

<p><strong>It will become a criminal offence to possess a mobile phone in prison, following reports that illicit mobile phones are common in Britain's jails. More than 300 illicit mobile phones and SIM cards were seized from inmates in Birmingham Prison last year, according to Government figures.</strong><br />
<strong><br />
Broadcasting watchdog Ofcom will gain the power to appoint and fund "independently funded news consortia". These are partnerships of broadcasters, newspapers and bloggers, and the government is introducing the measure in an effort to stem the decline of regional media.</strong></p>

<p>Culture minister Sion Simon (Lab Erdington), a Birmingham MP, is helping to oversee the policy. Ministers are expected to announce next month that he first consortia will be Scotland, Wales and North West England.</p>

<p><strong>The Queen's Speech included a commitment to respond to the report setting out options for building a high speed rail line which will be published by the High Speed Two company in December.</strong></p>

<p><strong>The Government will press ahead with its Equality Bill, which includes measures to equalise pay between men and women.</strong></p>

<p>Public bodies will be obliged to publish reports revealing average pay for men and women, so that disparities are easy to spot, and private businesses with more than 250 staff will be encouraged to do the same - with the threat of new legislation if the private sector fails to comply.</p>

<p><strong>A new Child Poverty Bill is one of the most blatant "political" bills in the Queen's Speech. It will set out a target of eradicating child poverty by 2020, and require government to draw up a new "child poverty strategy" every three years. However, government frequently publishes strategies without requiring legislation to do so, and the Bill is really a statement of intent designed to highlight Labour's commitment to reducing poverty.</strong></p>

<p><strong>There is a victory for campaigners such as John Spellar (Lab Warley), who had demanded better rights for agency workers. They will receive the same employment rights as permanent staff if they are employed for more than 12 weeks in the same job.</strong><br />
<strong><br />
Wheel clampers will be more strictly regulated to discourage "cowboy clampers" who target motorists unfairly, again dealing with an issue raised by a number of MPs.</strong></p>

<p><strong>The Government will once again press forward with creating an elected House of Lords - perhaps completing the reforms of the Lords it promised in its 1997 manifesto. Peers will also be allowed to resign and disclaim their peerage, allowing them to stand for election to the House of Commons.</strong></p>

<p>This has led to questions about Business Secretary Peter Mandelson, currently Lord Mandelson, and whether he might become an MP once again, allwoing him to stand for the Labour leadership. Questioned this morning, he said he had "no present plan" to return to the Commons.</p>

<p><strong>As widely trailed, a Personal Care at Home Bill will guarantee free personal care at home for up to 280,000 elderly and disabled people with the highest needs - although 166,000 do already receive free care. It's unclear why legislation is needed to increase the number of people receiving care.</strong></p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/11/quick-guide-to-the-queens-spee.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/11/quick-guide-to-the-queens-spee.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Politics</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">education</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">health</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Lord Mandelson</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Queen&apos;s Speech</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">social services</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:01:35 +0000</pubDate>

            <longitude></longitude>
            <latitude></latitude>
            <comments>1</comments>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>The BBC, expenses, and the golden age of journalism</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>The BBC chief I feel sorriest for is Tom Sleigh, Chief Adviser Operations, slaving away for an annual pittance of £76,300.<br />
Poor old Tom. How must he be feeling after a national newspaper exposed the 100 best-paid Beeb executives, with Mr Sleigh anchored in bottom place?<br />
It's unclear to me what a Chief Adviser Operations does, although giving advice is clearly a large part of the job, but no doubt he is worth every penny.<br />
Even James Heath, Controller Strategy Journalism, is on £85,000, while Richard Addy, Chief Adviser Journalism, is paid £104,000.<br />
I'm particularly taken by Sue Inglish, Head of Political Programmes. At £125,000, this is a job I venture modestly to suggest one might be interested in should a vacancy occur in the not too distant future. Wouldn't mind a crack at Head of Newsgathering either, at £165,000, if present incumbent Francesca Unsworth decides to call it a day.<br />
</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/11/the-bbc-expenses-and-the-golde.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/11/the-bbc-expenses-and-the-golde.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">BBC</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Mark Thompson</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:02:14 +0000</pubDate>

            <longitude></longitude>
            <latitude></latitude>
            <comments>2</comments>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>One day . . . 1 Day . . . 24th November at the Light House, Wolverhampton</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>I was out of town for the first and, so far, only showing of <strong><a href="http://www.1daythemovie.co.uk/">1 Day</a></strong> here in Birmingham. So like nearly everyone else here, I haven't seen the film made by the internationally renown <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0941085/">Penny Woolcock</a> and a remarkable cast of local men and women including the new-found talent <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2009/oct/22/dylan-duffus-star-1day">Dylan Duffus</a>. </p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="1_day_01.jpg" src="http://blogs.birminghampost.net/lifestyle/1_day_01.jpg" width="440" height="246" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></span></p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/11/one-day-1-day.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/11/one-day-1-day.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Culture</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">1 Day</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Dylan Duffus</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Handsworth</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Penny Woolcock</category>
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:26:13 +0000</pubDate>

            <longitude></longitude>
            <latitude></latitude>
            <comments>4</comments>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Don&apos;t hold your breath for the Rover trust fund to pay up</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>I've been writing today about the MG Rover trust fund, which was discussed in a House of Commons debate led by Richard Burden (Lab Northfield), the Birmingham MP.</p>

<p>You may know that the former Rover directors, known as the Phoenix Four, promised to turn what left of the business into cash to be distributed to former employees, when the carmarker collapsed in 2005.</p>

<p>So far there's been no money, and the official explanation is that the business could not be liquidated while an official government inquiry into its affairs was still taking place.</p>

<p>Now that the inquiry is over - it reported in September - Mr Burden wants the money transferred to the employees' fund as soon as possible.</p>

<p>Fair enough. But let's remember that there is no guarantee there will ever be any money at all.</p>

<p>The corpse of MG Rover has creditors as well as assets. It needs to pay them off first.</p>

<p>Some of the Government's critics have talked up the importance of the trust fund, claiming that the lengthy inquiry into Rover's affairs stopped former employees getting their cash.</p>

<p>But they may be guilty of raising false hopes. I hope former Rover staff receive compensation but I wouldn't assume anything until they have the money in their pockets.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/11/dont-hold-your-breath-for-the.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/11/dont-hold-your-breath-for-the.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Politics</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Phoenix Four</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Richard Burden</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Rover</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:42:45 +0000</pubDate>

            <longitude></longitude>
            <latitude></latitude>
            <comments>4</comments>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Time for Be Birmingham to step out of the shadows and answer some questions</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>The ongoing row over Be Birmingham's use of the city's £115 million Working Neighbourhoods Fund puts the spotlight on a very shadowy organisation.<br />
It is doubtful whether many people outside of the rarefied world of local government have ever heard of the City Strategic Partnership, as Be Birmingham used to be known before undergoing a trendy name change.<br />
But this unelected body, which meets behind closed doors in private, is entrusted by the city council and the government to play an increasingly important role in deciding how large sums of public money should be spent - or not spent in this case.<br />
</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/11/time-for-be-birmingham-to-step.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/11/time-for-be-birmingham-to-step.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">be birmingham</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">birmingham city council</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Paul Tilsley</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:11:08 +0000</pubDate>

            <longitude></longitude>
            <latitude></latitude>
            <comments>3</comments>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>West Midlands Select Committee Growing Ever-Smaller</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>I've written in the past about how the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats are boycotting the West Midlands select committee, a House of Commons committee set up to ensure the Government is giving the region a fair deal.</p>

<p>Now it seems even Labour can't get its members on the Committee. The whole thing is rapidly descending into farce, despite the best efforts of the chairman, Birmingham MP Richard Burden (Lab Northfield).</p>

<p>There are supposed to be nine members of the West Midlands committee, which is currently investigating the effects of the recession on the people of the region.</p>

<p>Five of these are  meant to be Labour, with three Tories and one Liberal Democrat.</p>

<p>But the Tories won't turn up, because they object to the whole idea of regional government.</p>

<p>The Lib Dems are also boycotting the committee, because they feel it is unfair they only get one member on the regional committee in places such as the south west where they have a lot of MPs (this doesn't really apply to the West Midlands, but local MPs are boycotting it anyway).</p>

<p>Mr Burden attempted to get independent MP Richard Taylor (Ind Wyre Forest) on the committee - but Lib Dems have managed to block this, by objecting to it in the House of Commons.</p>

<p>Now, Labour MP David Kidney (Lab Stafford) has left the committee, because he has got a Government job as an energy minister.</p>

<p>MP Janet Dean (Lab Burton) is meant to be his replacement.</p>

<p>But her appointment has also been blocked by opposition MPs, who appear determined to ensure the committee fails.</p>

<p>So out of nine committee places, only four are currently filled - and even Labour is only taking four of the five seats it is entitled to.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/10/west-midlands-select-committee.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/10/west-midlands-select-committee.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Politics</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Richard Burden</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">West Midlands Select Committee</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:13:46 +0000</pubDate>

            <longitude></longitude>
            <latitude></latitude>
            <comments>2</comments>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Did Mike Whitby really mean 8,000 when he said 800 jobs to go at city council?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>It is no great surprise that Birmingham City Council leader Mike Whitby is not encouraged by his advisers to grant live media interviews.<br />
But, oddly enough, the man who finds it difficult not to embellish the simplest of claims appeared to be erring very much on the side of caution when he told BBC TV that some 800 council jobs were likely to go as part of a major cost-cutting drive.<br />
Had Whitby stuck an additional nought on the end, he might have been nearer the mark.<br />
The question at the city council has always been not so much how many jobs are likely to disappear, but how quickly can we get rid of them?</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/10/did-mike-whitby-really-mean-80.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/10/did-mike-whitby-really-mean-80.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">birmingham city council</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">mike whitby</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:26:25 +0000</pubDate>

            <longitude></longitude>
            <latitude></latitude>
            <comments>2</comments>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Food from Dale End?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Having raised the issue of food security (along with a low-cost, convivial alternative-style means of regeneration) as a topic for their <a href="http://wmro.wordpress.com/2009/10/21/presentations-and-speeches-from-annual-conference/">Annual Conference</a> last week with publication of Roger Levett's essay  in <em>Fit for Purpose</em> (see <a href="http://blogs.birminghampost.net/lifestyle/2009/10/there-was-on-line-comment-and.html">blog entry</a>), the WMRO appears to have promptly ignored it all.<br />
 <br />
<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Food.jpg" src="http://blogs.birminghampost.net/lifestyle/Food.jpg" width="260" height="194" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></span>Food after all, appears as if by magic. When the Conference delegates ate their lunch, I'll bet they thought little, if at all, about the fragility of the just-in-time systems that got it there, let alone where on earth it originally came from.</p>

<p>Or, as pertinently, where it all went to. This includes what the food companies chuck at source or in transit, the freegan stuff the supermarkets discard, the 30% we throw away, and the dung we produce.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/10/food-from-not-to-dale-end.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/10/food-from-not-to-dale-end.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Business</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Dickson Despommier</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">food security</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Roger Levett</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">vertical farming</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">WMRO</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:10:48 +0000</pubDate>

            <longitude></longitude>
            <latitude></latitude>
            <comments>6</comments>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Let&apos;s Give Spin the Red Card</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Birmingham's football clubs face a tax hike of more than £900,000 next year thanks to increases in business rates, according to Conservatives.</p>

<p>A press release from the Tories claims that Villa will see business rates go up from £637,775 to £1,309,380, an increase of £671,605.</p>

<p>And rates paid by Blues will go up from £575,460 to £334,650, an increase of £240,810.</p>

<p>Between them, they'll be paying an extra £912,415 to the taxman. It's all a result of a revaluation of business properties which comes into effect next year. </p>

<p>For example, Villa Park's rateable value has increased from £1.3 million to £3.1 million (according to the inspectors who decide these things), as you can see here: <a href="http://www.2010.voa.gov.uk/rli/en/basic/find/assessment-history/2010/10341021000">http://www.2010.voa.gov.uk/rli/en/basic/find/assessment-history/2010/10341021000</a></p>

<p>St Andrews is now deemed to be worth £1.4 million rather than £700,000 - and here's the link: <a href="http://www.2010.voa.gov.uk/rli/en/basic/find/assessment-history/2010/11144765000">http://www.2010.voa.gov.uk/rli/en/basic/find/assessment-history/2010/11144765000</a></p>

<p>As revaluations occur every five years, and the last one was in 2005, I'm not sure how shocking this is. Conservatives claim it could lead to higher ticket prices.</p>

<p>But what makes me smile a little is the toe-curling comment from Tory Shadow Local Government Minister Justine Greening.</p>

<p>She is quoted in the press release saying: "Even football, our national sport, is not safe from Gordon Brown's tax rises.</p>

<p>"If clubs pass on these extra costs, it could mean even higher ticket prices for fans. I'm sure many will think it is time to show this Government the red card."</p>

<p>It's one of those phrases that nobody would ever actually use, except perhaps when speaking to the media.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/10/lets-give-spin-the-red-card.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/10/lets-give-spin-the-red-card.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Politics</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Aston Villa</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Birmingham City</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">business rates</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:18:54 +0000</pubDate>

            <longitude></longitude>
            <latitude></latitude>
            <comments>0</comments>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>A new era for the Birmingham Post</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>In three weeks' time, the last daily edition of the printed version of the<br />
Birmingham Post will roll off our presses in Erdington, marking the end of<br />
a publishing tradition that stretches back more than 150 years.</p>

<p>But it also marks a rebirth, as the Post starts a new chapter in its<br />
evolution as a multimedia brand and its new life as a must-read weekly<br />
title.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/10/a-new-era-for-the-birmingham-p.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/10/a-new-era-for-the-birmingham-p.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Editor</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Post Developments</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">birmingham</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">birmingham mail</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">birmingham post</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">media</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">news media</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">newspapers</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:41:20 +0000</pubDate>

            <longitude></longitude>
            <latitude></latitude>
            <comments>9</comments>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Birmingham - hungry city?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>There was on-line comment and a flurry of emails after last week's entry <a href="http://blogs.birminghampost.net/lifestyle/2009/10/green-shoots-of-recovery.html"><em>Green shoots of recovery</em></a>. This was about Roger Levett's essay on guerrilla spud-growing in the WMRO publication <em><a href="http://www.wmro.org/standardTemplate.aspx/Home/OurResearch/Economyandworkforce/WestMidlandsFitfortheFuture">West Midlands: Fit for the Future</a></em>.</p>

<p>I was led to the eloquent and engaging talk by the architect <a href="http://www.hungrycitybook.co.uk/blog/?page_id=5">Carolyn Steel</a> at the 2009 TED Conference in Oxford. She wrote <a href="http://www.hungrycitybook.co.uk/index.htm"><em>Hungry City: How food shapes our lives</em></a>.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/10/there-was-on-line-comment-and.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/10/there-was-on-line-comment-and.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Business</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Carolyn Steel</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">food security</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Hungry City</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Roger Levett</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">West Midlands</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">WMRO</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:42:09 +0000</pubDate>

            <longitude></longitude>
            <latitude></latitude>
            <comments>2</comments>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Is this the beginning of the end of local government as we know it?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Is local government in terminal decline?<br />
I only ask since it seems certain that forecast savage public spending cuts will force more Midland councils to hand over the dwindling number of services they continue to run to the private and voluntary sectors <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yglag9v"></a><br />
The talk is of local authorities "commissioning" service delivery rather than providing it directly and the shift over the past decade has been amazing.<br />
Even Birmingham City Council, which unusually for a large English authority continues to run most services in-house, is beginning to dismantle some of the last vestiges of a century of municipalisation.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/10/is-this-the-beginning-of-the-e.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/10/is-this-the-beginning-of-the-e.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">birmingham city council</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:52:50 +0000</pubDate>

            <longitude></longitude>
            <latitude></latitude>
            <comments>4</comments>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Will a Conservative Government be the Age of the Blogger?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Amidst all the talk about raising pension ages and fixing the economy, Conservatives have thrown out some interesting ideas for making government more open, at their Manchester conference.</p>

<p>These include a public consultation stage for new laws - after a Bill's second reading in the Commons but before it goes into committee stage, when amendments are drawn up - allowing the public to suggest changes</p>

<p>This will all be done online.</p>

<p>The Tories also plan to cut back on inspections of local authorities, and instead tell councils to publish every item of spending above £500 online.</p>

<p>The idea would be to replace the top-down accountability that exists at the moment with a bottom-up regime, where residents are able directly to scrutinise what their councils are doing.</p>

<p>While the aim is to let individuals get more involved in government, there will also be a role for mainstream media and bloggers in making sense of it all and providing forums for debate.</p>

<p>Of course, it also means there is a danger that people without internet access will be excluded from parts of the democratic process.   </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/10/will-a-conservative-government.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/2009/10/will-a-conservative-government.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Politics</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">blogs</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">conservative party conference</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Conservatives</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:03:28 +0000</pubDate>

            <longitude></longitude>
            <latitude></latitude>
            <comments>1</comments>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
